https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4C8-RSgKmWs

It seems that a new political era is being born for everywhere: Greece; Spain; India... .

One argues that they are political forces of the «citizenship», supposing that they will impose "social justice".
 
But the problem is that they always will remain as political PARTIES in the same political REPRESENTATIVE regime. So the vicious will be not removed. And people, sooner or later, will be disappointed.
 
The citizenship has to do with a society of political «participation», which necessarily is republican.

And we begin just from this point: there was no republics until today (!), as we cannot distinguish between a so-called «monarchy» and a pretentious «republic» even nowadays.
 
What are the essential differences?

In the supposed republics of the present times the wife of the president is ridiculously called «the first lady». Showing that they are not «republics», but only «popular monarchies», rotating the exercise (?) of the Power, while a king or a queen will stay in the apex of the social pyramid in a lifelong way.

However, those societies organize themselves and work in a same way, no matter we consider: the economic side, or the political one.

It is not enough someone tell that is «rich». It is necessary to have richness.

It is not sufficient someone argue that is simply more than a clever person, because anyone needs to prove the own intelligence through some well-demonstrated skills.

A popular poet (...) once wrote: «I know that I seem to be a thief, but there are many others who I know, who, seeming to be not what they are, at last they are what I seem to be» (...as «to be or not to be», that will «be the question» all the time...).

EV,

March 2015.