|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-t8VxLPEJQ
I
Thought is more real than a leg, because, nevertheless being invisible, untouchable and unquantifiable at all, it is it that values the leg, just due to be able to conceive it (once it possesses the FORCE to do that), giving it the sense that it hasn't by itself, while the leg can't conceive the thought or itself as a member of a body. Even the body, as a whole, cannot do it.
So: what is real is one's thought and not a passing body.
This is an illusion, as a passing thing that it is. All materially determined things are illusions because will pass on, while thought remains equal, the SAME, as a primary force (condition) that it is, first of all, and not as an act (the act of the thought is just the speech, an exercise belonging to the domain of the rationality, when the force-thought, as a condition, is, in other hand, the pure CAPACITY to tie concepts and thus build the judgments, which are the first composition of a thought translated into a grammatical form under the presentation of the phrases).
That's why mind is over matter.
II
Then your eyes, your ears and all your several Senses do not bring to you the true reality.
This reality is bodily untouchable, invisible, not heard... .
That's why the empiricism assumes a quite wrong philosophical (?) position: considering the (necessarily sensory) EXPERIENCE the beginning of all reality, forget that the experience is given by the Senses and these «can mistake us», as Descartes underscored in his method(ology).
And why?
Just because the Senses data are given by the TIME and this time tells us that nothing in Nature can get place forever – only what is PERMANENT and IMMUTABLE can truly be REAL [ontology says (and shows) it].
And also that's why the empiricism is the direct door to the materialism of nowadays, the real cancer of western civilization, which finally contaminated all the Earth.
Was this that became the nucleus of the actual civilizational troubles.
EV,
12-09-2014.